Alexander R. Galloway: Jodi’s Infrastructure - From the start I really enjoyed how the article describes what is done on the web as a tool for art even with its mathematical implementation. The article splits this idea into two categories: "Working on it" and "working within it" these to categories were described as where they both are imfluenced on how the creator is looking at their task or project. Working on is classified as Content whcih dissolves into context, and context itself becomes content. There is no outside inflence to it becuase whatever the medium is thats what represents the work and the message is protrsyed by what is put on that medium nothing more. Kind of like math. The author states that modern computer art was based on the message that was on the meduim and what the author intended while the contemporary computer artists are abput how the enviroment can effect their piece. My favorite part was when the author talked about ASCII art and how simple emoticons and more complex faces made its own undertsanding and own language in a sort of way. The author continues to discuss Jodi's work on the web by describing their work where Jodi used ASCII letters of non latin characters in order to create specific websites with a unique ability which was with the nn.com and the nnn.com where it kept on looping refreshing from one site to the other. Other works include the arrow.com where it makes a triangular shape using the url. In the end I realized that Jodi took something that had a specific meaning and created something totally brand new with it and gave it another meaning.

Ted Nelson: Software - Mr.Nelson first talks about an instance where a computer was used in a different way which made compuyer comapines question it. It allowed the question of what computers can do into the article where it discussed that the computer has always been revolvoing around the ideas of it being scientific and knows everything. But then Nelson switches over to the question that what can a computer really do? The author describes this new term of media art as "Making things look good,feel right, and come across clearly should bea general objective." however the author says that the computer shouldnt be classified as a facility but more of an open medium where it can be used to create a unique experiecne everytime. Author states that media art should hemp the user think in a collective format about that is on the medium and they every peice on media art should have a purpose such as flickering, was it how the artist intended it to be? The author states that computers in the future will not be associated as scientific but more in the realms of modern. The author has a very nice quote in which it sums up the entire article which states ", computerization can take whatever form we wish it to; therefore we must learn about computers in order to wish better." This article complements the first article in the way that computers have its own meaning to every different individual so it should not be classified as a computing machine but more of a medium where you can do whatever you want.